MENAKAR RASA KEADILAN PADA PUTUSAN HAKIM PERDATA TERHADAP PIHAK KETIGA YANG BUKAN PIHAK BERDASARKAN PERSPEKTIF NEGARA HUKUM PANCASILA

Abdul Hakim(1*)

(1) Universitas Pancasila
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Law is a set of words that are systematically linking an authoritative text, according to Gustav Radbruch, it should contain three (3) elements, namely fairness, certainty and expediency. The application of the authoritative text in social life was an absolute authority of a judge in resolving a civil case. The judge, in the checking-hearing-deciding a case, not only expected to return the case to the original state (restitutio in integrum) before the advent of the dispute, but should attempt made every effort to not create new disputes or disputes derived from the subject matter examined. Therefore, it becomes very important role of the paradigm for a judge in deciding the case in order to fulfill a sense of justice. Therefore, deciding the case in a precise sense of justice will be a judge most important role. Nowadays, the meaning of "justice" in Civil Procedure Code only limited to the authority of the power of the parties bound by the principle of consensualism and the principle of freedom of contract. Therefore, based on the Law Paradigm (Philosophy) of Pancasila, Judge as an interpreter, in defining and applying the law, legal science must have the ability to deconstruct and reconstruct an authoritative text based paradigm embraced by a nation.

Keywords: the principle of consensualism, justice, pancasila, paradigm, civil procedural law


Full Text:

PDF


DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.25216/JHP.6.3.2017.361-378

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 0 times
PDF - 0 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Abstracted/Indexed by: