IMPLEMENTATION OF JUDICIAL ACTIVISM IN JUDGE’S DECISION

Indriati Amarini(1*)

(1) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


The task of the judge in realizing justice is inseparable from the decisions that are made. A qualified judge's decision is obtained through the judge's thought process through a choice of judges that reflects judicial activism. The problem in this research is how judicial activism is used by judges in issuing decisions and how the implementation of judicial activism in decision making. Judicial Activism is the choice of decision making by judges in order to realize justice. Judicial activism in the Indonesian judicial system is regulated in Article 5 paragraph (1) of Law Number 48 of 2009 concerning Judicial Power. The law requires judges to explore the law and sense of justice that lives in society. The implementation of judicial activism is carried out by judges through means of legal discovery. Through means of legal discovery, judges play an active role in realizing justice as a law that lives in a dynamically developing society.

Keywords


judicial activism, judge's decision, legal discovery

Full Text:

English

References


Abdullah, Mustafa. Laporan Penelitian Putusan Hakim Tahun 2007. Available at http://komisiyudisial. go.id

Ali, Achmad. Menguak Teori Hukum (Legal Theory) dan Teori Peradilan (Juicialprudence) Termasuk Interpretasi Undang-undang (Legisprudence), Kencana, Jakarta, 2013;

Alkostar, Artidjo. Membangun Pengadilan Berarti Membangun Peradaban Bangsa, Varia Peradilan 20 No. 38 (2005)

Amarini, Indriati. Keaktifan Hakim Dan Peradilan Administrasi, UMPurwokerto Press, Purwokerto, 2017;

Angkasa, Nawa. "Analisis Kedudukan dan Fungsi Yudikatif Sebagai Pemegang Kekuasaan Kehakiman dalam Sistem Negara Hukum di Indonesia." Nizham Journal of Islamic Studies 1, no. 1 (2017): 84-109.

Burton, Steven J. Judging in Good Faith, Cambridge University Press, New York, 1992;

Cover, Robert M. "The origins of judicial activism in the protection of minorities." Yale LJ 91 (1981): 1287.

Dworkin, Ronald. Taking Rights Seriously, Universal Law Publishing, 1999.

Fauzan, M. Merebut Kepercayaan Publik Terhadap Pengadilan, Varia Peradilan Nomor 266 (2008)

Frank, Jerome. Hukum & Pemikiran Modern. Nusa Cendekia. Bandung translated by Rahmani Astuti fromJerome Frank, Law and The Modern Mind, Anchor Books Donbeday & Company, Inc, New York, 2013.

Garner Bryan A. Black’s Law Dictionary, eighth edition, Thomson West, 2004;

Hart., H.L.A Konsep Hukum, translated by M. Khozin from H.L.A. Hart, The Concept of Law, Clarendon Press-Oxford, New York, 2013

Jianjun, Yang. “The Development of Judicial Activism in China,” Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law, 01 (2010-01)

Klatt, Mathias. Making The Law Explicit The Normativity of Legal Argumentation, Hart Publishing, Oxford and Portland Oregon, 2008;

Lotulung, Paulus Efendi. Hukum Tata Usaha Negara Dan Kekuasaan, Salemba Humanika, Jakarta, 2013;

Manan, Bagir. Hakim dan Pemidanaan, Majalah Hukum Varia Peradilan Edisi No. 249 (2006).

Manan, Bagir. Judicial Precedent dan Stare Decisis (Sebagai Pengenalan), Varia Peradilan No. 347 (2014)

Manan, Bagir. Peranan Pedoman Tingkah Laku Hakim Sebagai Penjaga Kekuasaan Kehakiman yang Merdeka, Varia Peradilan No. 282 2009

Maruli, Jimly. Dicari: Putusan Yang Progresif, Varia Peradilan 25 No. 293 (2010).

Mertokusumo, Sudikno. Penemuan Hukum Sebuah Pengantar, Liberty, Yogyakarta, 2007.

Pachnanda, Vikrant “The Judicial Shelter-Activism or Overreach ?”, India Law Journal, vol 1 issue 1

Peidong, Gu “A Study on Several Issues of Active Justice”, China Legal Science 04 (2010)

Posner, Richard A. How Judges Think, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2010

Rahardjo, Satjipto. Hukum Progresif : Aksi Bukan Teks, In Satya Arinanto dan Ninuk Triyanti. Memahami Hukum Dari Konstruksi Sampai Implementasi. 2010

Rahardjo, Satjipto. Penegakan Hukum Progresif, Jakarta : Kompas Media Nusantara, 2010;

Rifai, Ahmad. Penemuan Hukum Oleh Hakim Dalam Perspektif Hukum Progresif, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta, 2014;

Scalia, Antonin & Bryan A. Garner, Reading Law: The Interpretation of Legal Texts, Thomson/West, United States of America, 2012;

Sudirman, Antonius. Hati Nurani Hakim dan Putusannya Suatu Pendekatan dari Perspektif Ilmu Hukum Perilaku (Behavioral Jurisprudence) Kasus Hakim Bismar Siregar, Citra Aditya, Bandung, 2007;

Suyoto, Hadi. Komitmen Hukum Dan Kritik Legalisme Bagi Hakim, Varia Peradilan 25 No. 293 (2010).

Tumpa, Harifin A. Problem Hukum Keluarga Antara Realita Dan Kepastian Hukum, Varia Peradilan Nomor 286 (2009).

Warassih, Esmi. Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Dalam Mewujudkan Tujuan Hukum (Proses Penegakan Hukum dan Persoalan Keadilan). Semarang: Universitas Diponegoro

Wardiono, Kelik. “Sistem Hukum Cina: Sebuah Tatanan Yang Terkonstruksi dalam Lintasan Li dan Fa, Jurnal Ilmu Hukum”. Volume 15 Nomor 1 (Maret 2012)

Zhi, Zhang. “The Function From of Chinese Justice: Judicial Activism or Positive Justice?”, Journal of Renmin University of China 209-06




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.25216/JHP.8.1.2019.21-38

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 0 times
English - 0 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Abstracting and Indexing By: