THE REFORMULATION OF PARTIES DOMICILE REQUIREMENTS IN SMALL CLAIM COURT

Izzatun Tiyas Rohmatin(1*), M Nur Syafiuddin(2)

(1) Pengadilan Agama Sungai Raya
(2) 
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


The requirements of domicile (the same domicile of both parties) in small claim court still become an obstacle in a real application. The purpose of this study is: first, to analyze the linkage between small claim court with the principle of simple, fast, and low-cost. Second, to analyze the realization of the principle of simple, fast, and low cost in both parties' setting domicile in small claim court. Third, to find the formulation of regulation criteria of both parties domicile in small claim court. This research is normative law research, which emphasizes the same domicile requirements on a small claim court. The research results showed that: first, the settlement of the small claim court is the realization of the simple, fast, and low-cost principle. Second, the simple, fast, and low-cost principles are not fully implemented in the  arrangement of  the parties  domicile. Third, the reformulation of the setting of the domicile of the parties in small claim court is: the parties are domiciled in the same court jurisdiction; If the Plaintiff is not domiciled in the same jurisdiction with the Defendant, the Plaintiff can be called electronically and/ or Plaintiffs can file a lawsuit and appoint a power of attorney, the power of the incidental or representative located in the jurisdiction of domicile of the Defendant with a letter of assignment from the institution of the Plaintiff.


Keywords


Reformulation, the Domicile of The Parties, Small Claim Court, simple, fast, and low cost.

Full Text:

English

References


Ali, Achmad dan Wiwie Heryani, Menjelejahi Kajian Empiris Terhadap Hukum, Jakarta: Kencana Prenadamedia Group, 2012.

Ali, M. Hatta, Peradilan Sederhana, Cepat, dan Biaya Ringan Menuju Keadilan Restoratif, Bandung: PT Alumni, 2012.

Ariani, Nevey Varida, Gugatan Sederhana dalam Sistem Peradilan di Indonesia, https://ejournal.balitbangham.go.id/index.php/dejure/article/vie w/502, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30641/dejure.2018.V18.381-396, diakses pada tanggal 1 Desember 2020, pukul 08.00 WIB.

Bedner, A Framework for Strengthening Access o Justice in Indonesia, World Bank 2004,http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTJUSFORPOOR/Re sources/A2JFrameworkEnglish.pdf, diakses pada tanggal 10 Agustus 2018, pukul 02.00 WIB.

Fakhriah, Efa Laela, Mekanisme Penyelesaian Sengketa Bisnis yang Efektif dan Efisien, Bandung: Keni, 2012.

Fuller, Lon L., Morality of Law, New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1964.

Hukumonline, Perbedaan Peradilan dengan Pengadilan, http://m.hukumonline. com/klinik/detail/lt548d38322cdf2/perbedaan-peradilan-dengan- pengadilan, diakses pada tanggal 12 Maret 2018, pukul 21.00 WIB.

Hukumonline, Urgensi Terbitnya Peraturam Mahkamah Agung tentang Small Claim Court, http://www.hukumonline.com/berita/baca/lt55d71ac1805

b/urgensi-terbitnya-perma-ismall-claim-court-i., diakses pada tanggal 12 Maret 2018, pukul 21.00 WIB.

Mansyur, Ridwan dan D.Y. Witanto, Gugatan Sederhana Teori, Praktik dan Permasalahannya, Cet. I, Jakarta: Pustaka Dunia, 2017.

Putra, Nanda Narendra Putra, Implementasi Perma Gugatan Sederhana Terbentur Masalah Domisili, dalam hukumonline, http://www.hukumonline.com/berita/ baca/lt576961058a940/implementasi-perma-gugatan-sederhana- terbentur-masalah-domisili, diakses pada tanggal 20 Agustus 2018, pukul 22.00 WIB.

Riyanto, Benny dan Hapsari Tunjung Sekartaji, Pemberdayaan Gugatan Sederhana Perkara Perdata Guna Mewujudkan Penyelenggaraan Peradilan Berdasarkan Asas Sederhana, Cepat dan Biaya Ringan, https://ejournal.undip.ac.id/index.php/mmh/article/download/21666/14771, diakses pada tanggal 1 Desember 2020, pukul 08.20 WIB.

Suadi, Amran, Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah: Penemuan dan Kaidah Hukum, Jakarta: Kencana Prenadamedia Group, 2018.

Tanya, Bernard L., Politik Hukum Agenda Kepentingan Bersama, Yogyakarta: Genta Publishing, 2011.

The World Bank, IFC, Kementerian Negara Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara, et all, Small Enterprise Development Policies in Indonesia : An Overview, dalam The Internasional Finance Corporate Indonesia, Doing Business in Indonesia 2012 A Copublication of The World Bank and The International Finance Corporation, Washington: IFC-World, 2012.

Yasin, Muhammad, Peradilan yang Sederhana, Cepat, dan Biaya Ringan, http://m.hukumonline.com/berita/baca/lt5a7682eb7e074/peradil an-yang-sederhana-cepat-dan-biayaringan, diakses pada tanggal 12 Maret 2018, pukul 21.00 WIB.

Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.

Undang-Undang Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman.

Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 1989 tentang Peradilan Agama sebagaimana diubah dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 3 Tahun 2006 dan Undang-Undang Nomor 50 Tahun 2009.

Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 2 Tahun 2015 tentang Tata Cara Penyelesaian Gugatan Sederhana.

Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 14 Tahun 2016 tentang Tata Cara Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah.

Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 3 Tahun 2018 tentang Administrasi Perkara di Pengadilan Secara Elektronik.

Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 4 Tahun 2019 tentang Perubahan Atas Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 2 Tahun 2015 tentang Tata Cara Penyelesaian Gugatan Sederhana.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.25216/jhp.9.3.2020.523-542

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Abstracting and Indexing by: