IDEAS FOR STRENGTHENING SUPREME COURT JUDICIAL REVIEW AUTHORITY IN REVIEW OF REGIONAL REGULATIONS

Muh Risnain(1*)

(1) faculty of law, University of Mataram
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Abstract

The problem of judicial review of regional regulations in the Supreme Court is a serious academic and practical issue that needs to be resolved after the issuance of the decision of the Constitutional Court Number 137 / PUU-XIII / 2015. There are two problems in this paper, first, the legal implications of the Constitutional Court Decision Number 137 / PUU-XIII / 2015 on institutional and legal procedures for judicial review of regional regulations in the Supreme Court, secondly, how is the concept of the Supreme Court judicial review carried out through renewal of procedural law Trial Judicial Review in the Supreme Court? Based on the discussion above, we can conclude two things, first, the legal implications of the Constitutional Court Decision Number 137 / PUU-XIII / 2015 on the institutional and legal procedures for judicial review of regional regulations in the Supreme Court are the stronger and increasing authority of judicial review in Supreme Court. This decision ended the dualism of review of local regulations from judicial review by the Supreme Court and executive review of regional regulations by the Ministry of Home Affairs to only a judicial review by the Supreme Court, also potentially increasing the number of cases of judicial review in the Supreme Court. Second, the concept of the implementation of a judicial review by the Supreme Court is carried out through legal renewal of the judicial review proceedings in the Supreme Court by including several important substances, related to hearings that are open to the public, the existence of a preliminary examination, hearing, verdict and decision making that are more open and fair.

Keywords: Regional Regulation, Judicial Review, and Reformation

 


ABSTRAK

Problem judicial review Perda di Mahkamah Agung menjadi persoalan akademik dan praktikal serius yang perlu dipecahkan pascakeluarnya putusan Mahkamah konstitusi Nomor 137/PUU-XIII/2015. Terdapat dua masalah dalam tulisan ini, pertama, implikasi hukum Putusan Mahkamah konstitusi Nomor 137/PUU-XIII/2015 terhadap kelembagaan dan hukum acara judicial review perda di mahkamah agung, kedua, bagaimanakah konsep pelaksanaan judicial review perda oleh mahkamah agung dilakukan melalui pembaharuan hukum acara persidangan judicial review di mahkamah agung?. Berdasarkan pembahasan di atas maka dapat disimpulkan dua hal , pertama, implikasi hukum Putusan Mahkamah konstitusi Nomor 137/PUU-XIII/2015 terhadap kelembagaan dan hukum acara judicial review perda di mahkamah agung adalah semakin kuat dan meningkatnya kewenangan judicial review di mahakamah agung. Putusan ini mengakhiri dualisme review perda dari judicial review oleh MA dan executive review perda oleh kemendagri menjadi hanya judicial review oleh Mahkamah Agung, juga berpotensi meningkatkan jumlah perkara judicial review perda di mahkamah agung. Kedua, konsep pelaksanaan judicial review perda oleh mahkamah agung dilakukan melalui pembaharuan hukum acara persidangan judicial review di mahkamah agung dengan memasukan beberapa substansi penting, terkait sidang yang terbuka untuk umum, adanya proses pemeriksaan pendahuluan, pemeriksaan persidangan, pembuktian dan pengambilan putusan yang lebih terbuka dan fair.

Kata Kunci : Peaturan Daerah, JudicialReview, dan Pembaharuan.


Keywords


Regional Regulation, Judicial Review, and Reformation

Full Text:

English

References


BIBLIOGRAPHY

Abdul Mukti Fadjar, Teori Hukum, Malang, Intranspress, 2003.

Achmad, Mulyanto, Problematika pengujian peraturan perundang-undangan (judicial review) pada mahkamah agung dan mahkamah konstitusi, jurnal yustisia vol.2 no.1 januari – april 2013.

Andryan, Implikasi Putusan Hak Uji Materil Di Mahkamah Agung Terhadap Legalitas Pimpinan Dewan Perwakilan Daerah Republik Indonesia (implication of the decision on material review by the supreme court to the legality of chairman of the regional representative council of the republic of indonesia), Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure, ISSN 1410-5632 vol. 18 no. 3, september 2018.

Asfinawati, Menguatkan Mekanisme Pemenuhan Hak Konstitusional Perempuan Melalui Peradilan Terbuka judicial review di mahkamah agung, kertas kerja Komnas perempuan, 2013.

Jimly Asshidiqie, Hukum Acara Pengujian Undang-Undang, Konstitusi Press, Jakarta, 2006, .

Kartono, Politik Hukum Judicial Review Di Indonesia, Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, Vol.11 edisi khusus februari 2011,.

Maria Farida Indrati S., Ilmu Perundang-Undangan: Jenis, Fungsi Dan Materi Muatan (Buku 1), edisi revisi, jakarta: Penerbit Kanisius, 2007.

Mochtar Kusumaatmadja dan Arief Sidharta, Pengantar Ilmu Hukum, Alumni, Bandung,2003.

Mohammad Zamroni, Menakar Korelatifitas Antara Harmonisasi Peraturan Daerah Dengan Hak Uji Materiil Mahkamah Agung, http://ditjenpp.kemenkumham.go.id/htn-dan-puu/1156-menakar-korelatifitas-antara-harmonisasi-peraturan-daerah-dengan-hak-uji-materiil-mahkamah-agung.html.

Muhammad Ishar Helmi, Penyelesaian Satu Atap Perkara Judicial Review Di Mahkamah Konstitusi (one-roof settlement on the case of judicial review in the constitutional court), Salam; Jurnal Sosial & Budaya Syar-I Fsh Uin Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta vol. 6 no. 1 (2019).

Pusat Studi Konstitusi Fakultas Hukum Universitas Andalas Dan Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia, Perkembangan Pengujian Perundang-Undangan di mahkamah konstitusi, (dari berpikir hukum tekstual ke hukum progresif), Pusako Dan Sekjen MK,2010.

Sri Sumantri, hak uji materil di indonesia, Bandung, PT Alumni, 1977.

Yuswanto dan M. Yasin al-arif, diskursus pembatalan peraturan daerah Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi nomor 137/PUU-XIII/2015 dan putusan nomor 56 /PUU-XIV/2016, jurnal konstitusi vol. 15 no.4 desember 2018.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.25216/jhp.9.3.2020.505-522

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Abstracting and Indexing by: