DISPUTE SETTLEMENT IN THE OMBUDSMAN AND THE COURT OF LAW REGARDING COMPENSATION IN PUBLIC SERVICE DISPUTE

Muhammad Adiguna Bimasakti(1*)

(1) Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Jayapura
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Public Service is the embodiment of the main tasks of a governance. But in its implementation sometimes it also causes disputes due to losses experienced by community members due to a bad public service. Therefore Law No. 25 of 2009 concerning Public Services regulates dispute resolution in the implementation of public services. At least there are two types of ways to resolve compensation in public service dispute that caused by Tort in the Public Service, namely the Non-Litigation settlement through the Ombudsman, and the Litigation settlement through the Court. However, in further studies it was found that there was an overlap of authority between the Ombudsman and the Court in resolving public service disputes. This paper will try to discuss this in depth in terms of the philosophy of the existence of the Ombudsman, and its implications for its Special Adjudication authority. Aside from that, this paper will also discusses about the procedure of proceedings in the Administrative Court regarding public service disputes.


Keywords


Public Service; Compensation; Dispute; Ombudsman; Administrative Court

Full Text:

English

References


Bimasakti, Muhammad Adiguna. Perbuatan Melawan Hukum (PMH) Oleh Pemerintah / Onrechtmatige Overheidsdaad (OOD) Dari Sudut Pandang Undang-Undang Administrasi Pemerintahan. Yogyakarta: Deepublish, 2018.

______. Hukum Acara dan Wacana Public Lawsuit Di Indonesia Pasca Undang-Undang Administrasi Pemerintahan: Sebuah Sumbangan Pemikiran. Yogyakarta: Deepublish, 2019.

Daim, Nuryanto A. Hukum Administrasi: Perbandingan Penyelesaian Maladministrasi oleh Ombudsman dan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara. Surabaya: Laksbang Justitia, 2014.

Donner, A.M. Nederlands Bestuursrecht: Algemeen Deel. Wolters Kluwer Nederland B.V. 1953.

Hadjon, Philipus M. Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Rakyat Indonesia: Sebuah Studi tentang Prinsip-Prinsipnya, Penanganannya oleh Pengadilan dalam Lingkungan Peradilan Umum dan Pembentukan Peradilan Administrasi Negara. Surabaya: 1985, PT Bina Ilmu.

_______. et.al. Hukum Administrasi dan Good Governance. Jakarta: 2012, Penerbit Universitas Trisakti.

Lubis, M. Solly. Hukum Tata Negara. Bandung: 2008, CV Mandar Maju.

Mertokusumo, Sudikno, dan A. Pitlo. Bab-Bab Tentang Penemuan Hukum. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 1993.

Poerbopranoto, Koentjoro. Beberapa Catatan Hukum Tata Pemerintahan dan Peradilan Administrasi. Bandung: 1985, Penerbit Alumni.

Utrecht, E. Pengantar Hukum Tatausaha Negara Indonesia. Jakarta: N.V. Penerbitan dan Balai Buku Indonesia, 1957.

Langbroek, Philip M. dan Peter Rijpkema, “Demands of proper administrative conduct. A research project into the ombudsprudence of the Dutch National Ombudsman”. Utrecht Law Review Volume 2, Issue 2 (December) 2006, pp. 81-98.

Indonesia. UUD NRI 1945. Undang Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.

_______. Undang-Undang Tentang Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara. UU No. 5 Tahun 1986. LN No. 77 Tahun 1986. TLN No. 3344.

_______. Undang-Undang Tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang No. 5 Tahun 1986 Tentang Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara. UU No. 9 Tahun 2004. LN No. 35 Tahun 2004. TLN No. 4380.

_______. Undang-Undang Tentang Perubahan Kedua atas Undang-Undang No. 5 Tahun 1986 Tentang Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara. UU No. 51 Tahun 2009. LN No. 160 Tahun 2009. TLN No. 5079.

_______. Undang-Undang Tentang Ombudsman Republik Indonesia. UU No. 37 Tahun 2008. LN No. 139 Tahun 2008. TLN No. 4899.

_______. Undang-Undang Tentang Pelayanan Publik. UU No. 25 Tahun 2009. LN No. 112 Tahun 2009. TLN No. 5038.

_______. Undang-Undang Administrasi Pemerintahan. UU No. 30 Tahun 2014. LN No. 292 Tahun 2014. TLN No. 5601.

Supreme Court Regulations No. 6 of 2018 Regarding Guidelines for Resolving Government Administrative Disputes After Taking Administrative Proceedings.

Supreme Court Regulation No. 2 of 2019 Regarding Guidelines for Resolving Disputes on Government Actions and Authority to Judge Unlawful Acts by Government Agencies and / or Officers (Onrechtmatige Overheidsdaad).

Ombudsman RI. Peraturan Ombudsman Tentang Ajudikasi Khusus. Peraturan Ombudsman RI No. 31 Tahun 2018.

Koninkrijk der Nederlander, Wet Nationale Ombudsman, Wet van 4 Februari 1981, and its changes.

Koninkrijk der Nederlanden, Algemene Wet Bestuursrecht (AwB), Wet van 4 Juni 1992, and its changes.

https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/baca/lt5b83a09e9f6e0/potensi-persinggungan-kewenangan-ombudsman-dengan-badan-peradilan-oleh--enrico-simanjuntak accessed 25 May 2019.

https://www.nationaleombudsman.nl/de-nationale-ombudsman/wie-is-de-nationale-ombudsman accessed 25 May 2019.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.25216/jhp.10.2.2021.277-299

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Abstracting and Indexing by:

Google CendekiaISSN -International Standard Serial NumberBASE - Bielefeld Academic Search EngineBoston University LibrariesCopacCrossref Metadata SearchEBSCOHOLLIS is Harvard Library's catalogIPI-Indonesian Publication IndexISJD - Indonesian Scientific Journal DatabaseMendeley brings your researchNYU Libraries - New York University LibrariesOpen Academic Journals IndexPrinceton University LibraryDirectory of Open Access Scholarly Resources (ROAD)Sherpa RomeoScience and Technology IndexOxfordUCLA LibraryLeiden University LibrariesThe World's Largest Library Catalog