LEGAL IMPLICATIONS OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT DECISION ON THE APPLICATION OF RESTORATIVE JUSTICE CONCEPT IN INDONESIA
Abstract
The decision of the Constitutional Court Number 68/PUU-XV/2017 cancels Articles 96, Articles 100, and Article 101 of Law Number 11 of 2012 on the Juvenile Criminal Justice System. With this decision, the concept of restorative justice in Indonesia evolves even a stronger legal basis. In this paper, the research method that the researcher uses is a normative juridical legal method that is prescriptive means practical or applicable. This research aims to solve the problems of the research. The results of this study explain that after this decision of the Constitutional Court has been set, it implicates the law, which is the development of the ideal concept of restorative justice in Indonesia, that is regulated clearly and firmly in the Criminal Code, the Prosecutor's Law, and the Police Act, which can provide legal certainty regarding restorative justice so that it can realize the concept of restorative justice which conducting deliberation process by listening to and reassuring the aggrieved parties based on the philosophical values of the Indonesian nation that can provide social justice for all Indonesian people.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abdul Hakim Siagian, Putri Rumondang Siagian, dan Fitria Longgom Siagian, ‘Alternatif Metode Ganti Kerugian Terhadap Korban Tindak Pidana Sebagai Wujud Restorative Justice Dalam Perspektif RKUHAP’, Peradilan Indonesia Teropong, Vol 8, 1–34
Asshiddiqie, Jimly, Konstitusi Dan Konstitusionalisme Indonesia (Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2010)
Chandra, Septa, ‘Politik Hukum Pengadobsian Restorative Justice Dalam Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana’, Fiat Justicia Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Volume 8 N, 255–77
Crime, United Nations Office On Drugs And, Handbook on Restorative Justice Programmes Criminal Justice Handbook Series (New York: United Nations, 2006)
Faizal Azhar, Ahmad, ‘Penerapan Konsep Keadilan Restoratif (Restorative Justice) Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Di Indonesia’, Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam, 4.2 (2019), 138
Fasa, Angga Wijaya Holman, ‘Aspek Hukum Dan Kebijakan Pemerintah Indonesia Mengenai Ekonomi Sirkular Dalam Rangka Mencapai Tujuan Pembangunan Berkelanjutan’, Rechtsvinding, 10.3 (2021), 339–57
Gaycar, Adam, ‘Bullying and Victimisation In School: A Restorative Justice Approach’, Australian Institute of Crimonology, 219 (2002)
Gohar, Howard Zehr dan Ali, The Little Book of Restorative Justice (USA: Good Books Intercourse, 2003)
Hanafi Arief, dan Ningrum Ambarsari, ‘Penerapan Prinsip Restorative Justice Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Di Indonesia’, Al’Adl, Volume X N, 173–90
Harefa, Beniharmoni, ‘“Diversi Sebagai Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Hak Asasi Anak Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak Di Indonesia”’, Komunikasi Hukum, Volume 1, 1–13
Hayatuddin, Khalisah, and Muhamad Sadi Is, ‘Perlindungan Hukum Hak Asasi Manusia Dalam Memperoleh Hak Atas Tanah Di Indonesia ( Legal Protection of Human Rights in Obtaining Land Rights in Indonesia )’, 2022, 15–28
Johnstone, Gerry, And, and Daniel W. Van Ness, Handbook of Restorative Justice (USA: Willan Publishing, 2007)
Kurnia, Prayogo, Resti Dian Luthviati, and Restika Prahanela, ‘Penegakan Hukum Melalui Restorative Justice Yang Ideal Sebagai Upaya Perlindungan Saksi Dan Korban’, Majalah Ilmiah Gema, 27.49 (2015), 1497–1508
M.D, Moh. Mahfud, Membangun Politik Hukum Menegakkan Konstitusi (Jakarta: Pustaka LP3ES, 2006)
Manan, Bagir, Dasar-Dasar Ketatanegaraan RI Menurut UUD 1945 (Bandung: Universitas Padjajaran, 1994)
Mansyur, Ridwan, Mediasi Penal Terhadap Perkara KDRT (Kekerasan Dalam Rumah Tangga) (Jakarta: Yayasan Gema Yustisia Indonesia, 2010)
Mareta, Josefhin, ‘Penerapan Restorative Justice Melalui Pemenuhan Restitusi Pada Korban Tindak Pidana Anak’, Legislasi Indonesia, Vol 15 No., 309–19
Marlina, Peradilan Pidana Anak Di Indonesia Pengembangan Konsep Diversi Dan Restorative Justice, (Bandung: Refika Aditama, 2012)
Melani, Wagiati Soetedjo dan, Hukum Pidana Anak (Bandung: Refika Aditama, 2011)
Nazla, Lutfia, ‘Implikasi Putusan Mk Nomor 68/Puu-XV/2017 Terhadap Jaksa Penuntut Umum Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak’, Media Iuris, 2.1 (2019), 89
Perbawati, Candra, Jl Soemantri Brodjonegoro, and Bandar Lampung, ‘Penegakan Hak Asasi Manusia Di Era Globalisasi Dalam Perspektif Hukum Islam’, AL-‘ADALAH, Vol. XII, 843–54
Pertiwi, Yuarini Wahyu, and Ika Dewi Sartika Saimima, ‘Peranan Kontrol Sosial Dan Optimalisasi Kebijakan Keadilan Restoratif Pada Anak Pelaku Tindak Pidana’, Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan, 11.1 (2022), 109
Prayitno, KuatPuji, ‘Restorative Justice Untuk Peradilan Di Indonesia (Perspektif Yuridis Filosofis Dalam Penegakan Hukum In Concreto)’, Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 12.3 (2012), 407–20
Romi Ramanda, dan Agus Surono, ‘Restorative Justice Dalam Pidana Anak Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung No.731K/Pid.Sus/2015’, Hukum, Vol. 2, No, 4
Sinaga, Dahlan, Penegakan Hukum Dengan Pendekatan Diversi (Perspektif Teori Keadilan Bermartabat, (Yogyakarta: Nusa Media, 2017)
Subiyanto, Achmad Edi, Hakim Konstitusi Kekuasaan Kehakiman Dan Pengisian Jabatan (Depok: RajaGrafindo Persada, 2019)
Sudewo, Fajar Ari, Pendekatan Restorative Justice Bagi Anak Yang Berhadapan Dengan Hukum (Pekalongan: Nasya Expanding Management, 2021)
Ulil, Ahmadulil Ulil, ‘Penyelesaian Tindak Pidana Ringan Melalui Kearifan Lokal Dalam Pembangunan Sistem Hukum Nasional’, Jurnal Rechts Vinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional, 8.1 (2019), 113
Wahjono, Padmo, Pembangunan Hukum Di Indonesia (Jakarta: Ind-hill co, 1989)
Wijaya, Viona, ‘Perubahan Paradigma Penataan Regulasi Di Indonesia’, Rechtsvinding, Volume 10, 167–86
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.25216/jhp.11.2.2022.281-312
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
