Gender Mainstreaming through Guarantees of Legal Protection and Access to Justice for Women and Children in Religious Court
Abstract
Barriers to realizing accessibility for women and children in religious courts are still quite significant. Even after five years have passed since Supreme Court Regulation Number 3 of 2017 on Guidelines for Trying Women’s Cases in Conflict with the Law was published. The initial suspicion is that this is still an unresolved problem because law enforcement’s sensitivity to the needs of women and children has yet to be developed. Gender mainstreaming is then encouraged to overcome this. The problem that is the focus of discussion in this research is how to increase the accessibility of justice for women and children in religious courts. The aim is to elaborate and analyze the problem of how to increase the accessibility of justice for women and children in religious courts. The research method used is normative juridical, the research specification is descriptive analysis, and the data collection technique is library research. The research results show that most of the existing obstacles in access to justice and law for women and children after divorce still exist and still need to be resolved. The Supreme Court, as the supervisor of religious courts, has issued several regulations to overcome this problem. In fact, after several of these regulations were issued, difficulties with access to justice continued to occur, primarily related to the implementation of decisions/ executions. Gender mainstreaming by judges and religious court officials is needed to narrow the gap in access to justice and law for women and children after divorce. The urgency is because women and children are vulnerable parties, have limitations, and have extensive obstacles in accessing justice in court. Hence, they require support for convenience, priority access, simplification of business processes, and additional authority for judges in their positions (e.g., officio) when handling cases of women and children.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Aco Nur (Direktur Jenderal Badan Peradilan Agama Mahkamah Agung RI), Kebijakan Ditjen Badilag Dalam Meningkatkan Akses Keadilan Bagi Perempuan Dan Anak 2021, disampaikan dalam Dialog Badilag MA-RI &Family Court of Australia (FCoA), Jakarta, 5 Oktober 2021.
Agus Digdo Nugroho, Rekontruksi Dasar Hukum Kewenangan Eksekusi Isi Putusan Pengadilan Agama Terkait Pemenuhan Hak Mantan Istri Dan Anak, (Jakarta: Disertasi Universitas Jayabaya, 2023).
AIPJ2, Analisis Putusan Perkara Perceraian Di Indonesia, Jakarta, AIPJ2, 2020.
Alfeus Jebabun (et.al), Asesmen Awal Permasalahan Eksekusi Putusan Perkara Perdata Di Indonesia, (Jakarta: LeIP, 2018).
Data Perkara Ditjen Badilag Mahkamah Agung RI yang dihimpun berdasarkan Surat Nomor 772/DjA.3/HK.00/3/2021 tentang Permintaan Data tentang Putusan Pengadilan Agama Terkait Pemenuhan Hak Istri dan Anak Pasca Perceraian.
https://aipj.or.id/pages/publication/facilitating-access-to-justice-for-women-children-people-with-disabilities-sharing-between-fcfcoa-and-religious-courts-in-malang-and-surabaya;
https://www.kemenpppa.go.id/index.php/page/view/20#:~:text=Pengarusutamaan%20Gender%20adalah%20proses%20untuk,proyek%2C%20program%20dan%20kebijakan%20pemerintah
Indonesia Australia Legal Development Facility (IALDF), Akses terhadap Keadilan: Pemberdayaan Perempuan Kepala Keluarga di Indonesia, (Jakarta, 2010).
Kamarusdiana, Akses Keadilan Bagi Masyarakat Kabupaten Kepulauan Seribu, MIZAN: Journal of Islamic Law, FAI Universitas Ibn khaldun (UIKA) Bogor. Vol. 3 No. 1 (2019), pp: 1-24. ISSN: 2598-974X, E-ISSN: 2598-6252. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32507/mizan.v3i1.401
Kelompok Kerja (Pokja) Akses Keadilan Kejaksaan RI & Indonesia Judicial Research Society (IJRS), Pedoman Akses Keadilan Bagi Perempuan Dan Anak Dalam Penanganan Perkara Pidana. (Jakarta: AIPJ2, 2021).
Komnas Ham Republik Indonesia, Draf 02 Standar Norma dan Pengaturan Tentang Hak Memperoleh Keadilan https://www.komnasham.go.id/files/1635147719draf-02-snp-hak-memperoleh-keadilan-$EDS.pdf
MaPPI FHUI, Asesmen Konsistensi Putusan Pengadilan Kasus-Kasus Kekerasan Terhadap Perempuan, (Depok: BP FH UI, 2016).
Mas Mushendar, Efektivitas Eksekusi Menghambat Upaya PK, Jurnal Varia Peradilan Majalah Hukum Tahun XXIX No 344 Juli 2014.
Masyarakat Pemantau Peradilan Indonesia Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia, Berikan Akses Keadilan Terhadap Perempuan Dan Anak Korban KDRT! (Jakarta, MaPPI FHUI, 2021).
Muh. Irfan Husaeni, Disparitas Putusan Hakim Pengadilan Agama Dalam Menetapkan Mutah dan Iddah, Varia Peradilan XXIX No. 342 Mei 2014, IKAHI, Jakarta, 2014.
Muhammad Isna Wahyudi, Menjadi Hakim Sensitif Gender Varia Peradilan, Majalah Hukum, Tahun XXVII No. 317 Desember 2011, IKAHI, Jakarta, 2012.
Panduan dan Bunga Rampai: Bahan Pembelajaran PUG”, Badan Koordinasi Keluarga Berencana Nasional (BKKBN), Kementerian Negara Pemberdayaan Perempuan RI, dan United Nation Population Fund (UNFPA).
Siti Aminah Tardi (et.al) Laporan Penelitian Kualitatif Tinjauan Penerapan Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor 3 Tahun 2017 Tentang Pedoman Mengadili Perkara Perempuan Berhadapan Dengan Hukum Di Lima Mitra Wilayah Sistem Peradilan Pidana Terpadu Penanganan Kasus Kekerasan Terhadap Perempuan (SPPT-PKKTP): DKI Jakarta, (Jakarta: Komnas Perempuan-MaPPI FH UI, 2021).
Siti Musawwamah & Eka Susylawati, Penerapan Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Tentang Pedoman Mengadili Perkara Perempuan Berhadapan Dengan Hukum Di Peradilan Agama, (Pamekasan: Duta Media Publishing, 2019).
Syarifuddin, Aksesibilitas Keadilan Bagi Perempuan Dan Anak, (Jakarta: Imaji Cipta Karya, 2020).
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.25216/jhp.12.2.2023.267-292
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
