The Design Of The Idea Of Judicial Preview Authority Of The Constitutional Court In The Indonesian Constitutional System
Downloads
Adopting the authority of judicial review in the context of testing laws against the Constitution carried out by the Constitutional Court should be welcomed as positive progress for institutionalizing the authority of judicial review itself. In its implementation so far, the authority of judicial review has received serious attention, as evidenced by the number of laws submitted for review in the Constitutional Court. To streamline the authority to review regulations by the Constitutional Court, it is necessary to adopt a model of judicial preview authority, namely testing draft laws, so that when they are passed, they are no longer legally problematic. This research is normative juridical research using various literature materials as the main study. The results show that the idea of adopting the authority of judicial preview is urgently needed. It is based on the consideration that so many laws are problematic both in terms of content and formation process. On the other hand, the authority of the Constitutional Court is only limited to the authority of judicial review, making it less appropriate in the context of the efficiency of judicial review of laws. Given the urgency of the application of judicial preview authority by the Constitutional Court, it is necessary to consider efforts to amend the 1945 Constitution by adding the phrase “testing draft laws against the Constitution†in the article governing the authority of the Constitutional Court as practiced in other countries such as France.
Adriani, Nukeu, ‘Doctrine Of Judicial Review: A Tool to Examine the Constitutional Validity of Legislative, Executive and Judicial Actions’, Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Award of Degree Of (Karnavati University, 2018)
Amelin, Oleksandr, ‘Modernisation of The Constitutional and Legal Status of Judges in Ukraine’, Law Journal of the National Academy of Internal Affairs, 14.1 (2024): 40–49.
Arifin, Saru, ‘Illiberal Tendencies in Indonesian Legislation: The Case of the Omnibus Law on Job Creation’, The Theory and Practice of Legislation, 9.3 (2021): 386–403.
Batalli, Mirlinda, and Islam Pepaj, ‘Citizens’ Right To Seek Judicial Review of Administrative Acts and Its Impact on Governance Reforms’, Corporate Governance and Organizational Behavior Review, 6.2 (2022): 85–94.
Carrozza, Paolo, ‘Kelsen and Contemporary Constitutionalism: The Continued Presence of Kelsenian Themes’, Estudios de Deusto, 67.1 (2019): 55–82.
Epps, Daniel, and Ganesh Sitaraman, ‘How to Save the Supreme Court’, Yale Law Journal, 129.1 (2019): 148–206.
Fuady, Munir, Teori Negara Hukum Modern (Rechtstaat) (Bandung: Refika Aditama, 2009)
Gardbaum, Stephen, ‘What Makes for More or Less Powerful Constitutional Courts?’, SSRN Electronic Journal, 2017: 1–40.
Gersdorf, Małgorzata, and Mateusz Pilich, ‘Judges and Representatives of the People: A Polish Perspective’, European Constitutional Law Review, 16.3 (2020): 345–78.
Gilan, Syed Raza Shah, Ilyas Khan, and Shehla Zahoor, ‘The Historical Origins of the Proportionality Doctrine as a Tool of Judicial Review: A Critical Analysis’, Research Journal of Social Sciences & Economics Review, 2.1 (2021): 251–58.
Hoesein, Zainal Arifin, Judicial Review Di Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia: Tiga Dekade Pengujian Peraturan Perundang-Undangan (Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada, 2009).
Issacharoff, Samuel, ‘Judicial Review in Troubled Times: Stabilizing Democracy in a Second Best World’, SSRN Electronic Journal, 98.1 (2018).
Jaelani, Abdul Kadir, I. Gusti Ayu Ketut Rachmi Handayani, and Lego Karjoko, ‘Executability of the Constitutional Court Decision Regarding Grace Period in the Formulation of Legislation’, International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 28.15 (2019): 816–23.
Kammerhofer, Jörg, ‘Beyond the Res Judicata Doctrine: The Nomomechanics of ICJ Interpretation Judgments’, Leiden Journal of International Law, 37.1 (2024): 206–27.
Khaitan, Tarunabh, ‘The Indian Supreme Court’s Identity Crisis: A Constitutional Court or a Court of Appeals?’, Indian Law Review, 4.1 (2020): 1–30.
Konstitusi, Mahkamah, ‘REKAPITULASI PERKARA PENGUJIAN UNDANG-UNDANG’, 2024 <https://www.mkri.id/index.php?page=web.RekapPUU> [accessed 28 April 2024]
Latif, Abdul, Buku Ajar Hukum Acara Mahkamah Konstitusi (Yogyakarta: Total Media, 2009)
Lustig, Doreen, and J. H.H. Weiler, ‘Judicial Review in the Contemporary World- Retrospective and Prospective’, International Journal of Constitutional Law, 16.2 (2018): 315–72.
MD, Mahfud, Membangun Politik Hukum, Menegakkan Konstitusi (Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada, 2010).
Olechowski, Thomas, ‘Legal Hierarchies in the Works of Hans Kelsen and Adolf Julius Merkl’, Studies in the History of Law and Justice, 12 (2018), 353–62.
Paulson, Stanley, ‘Empowerment: Hans Kelsen and the Radical Theory of Legal Norms’, Analisi e Diritto, 19.1 (2019): 10–21.
Paulson, Stanley L., ‘Hans Kelsen on Legal Interpretation, Legal Cognition, and Legal Science’, Jurisprudence, 10.2 (2019): 188–221.
Permatasari, Indah, and I Made Subawa, ‘History of Judicial Review in Indonesia’, International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 11.2 (2017): 541–47.
Simamora, Janpatar, Mendesain Ulang Model Kewenangan Judicial Review Dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan Republik Indonesia (Yogyakarta: Capiya Publishing, 2013).
Syahrizal, Ahmad, Peradilan Konstitusi: Suatu Studi Tentang Adjudikasi Konstitusional Sebagai Mekanisme Penyelesaian Sengketa Normatif (Jakarta: Pradnya Paramita, 2006).
Thalib, Abdul Rasyid, Wewenang Mahkamah Konstitusi Dan Implikasinya Dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan Republik Indonesia (Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2006).
Tsebelis, George, ‘Constitutional Rigidity Matters: A Veto Players Approach’, British Journal of Political Science, 52.1 (2022): 280–99.
Winata, Muhammad, and Zaka Aditya, ‘Characteristic and Legality of Non-Litigation Regulatory Dispute Resolution Based on Constitutional Interpretation’, Brawijaya Law Journal, 6.2 (2019): 170–88.
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors confirm the transfer of all copyrights of the manuscripts to the Board Editors of Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan upon its acceptance for publication and that the Board Editors of Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan have the right to publish, republish, transmit, and distribute them in the JHP journal or other media.
- Manuscripts published by Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution -NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International, which allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Every submitted manuscript should be accompanied by a "Copyright Notice" and "Ethical Statement".
