The Role of Law Enforcement Officials: The Dilemma Between Professionalism and Political Interests
Downloads
This study delves deeply into the complex dilemma between professionalism and political interests that often grip performance and shape public perceptions of law enforcement officials. With a phenomenological approach applied through integrative and connective literature analysis, this study combines various perspectives, combining findings from multiple relevant studies to create a more holistic and comprehensive understanding. The conclusions of this study firmly state that strengthening the professionalism of law enforcement officers is a significant endeavor because professionalism in law enforcement is an essential foundation for upholding justice, transparency, and human rights. Achieving a high level of professionalism requires a holistic and integrated approach, including institutional reform, adequate supervision, continuing education, and developing a robust organizational culture. Success in law enforcement depends on the strict application of rules and building positive relationships between law enforcement officers and the communities they serve. Through community-based approaches, respect for human rights, and a commitment to integrity and accountability, law enforcement systems can be strengthened to ensure fair, transparent, and trustworthy justice.
Adam, Heribert. “Corruption, Race Relations and the Future of South Africa.†Canadian Journal of African Studies/Revue canadienne des études africaines 52, no. 2 (2018): 229–239.
Ahonen, Pertti, and Tero Erkkilä. “Transparency in Algorithmic Decision-Making: Ideational Tensions and Conceptual Shifts in Finland.†Information Polity 25, no. 4 (2020): 419–432.
Albrecht, Berit. “Multicultural Challenges for Restorative Justice: Mediators’ Experiences from Norway and Finland.†Journal of Scandinavian Studies in Criminology and Crime Prevention 11, no. 1 (2010): 3–24.
Anders, Gerhard, Fidelis E Kanyongolo, and Brigitte Seim. “Corruption and the Impact of Law Enforcement: Insights from a Mixed-Methods Study in Malawi.†The Journal of Modern African Studies 58, no. 3 (2020): 315–336.
Andersen, Per. “Lay Mediators in the Future.†Restorative Justice 3, no. 1 (2015): 114–118.
Baker, Bruce. “Reconstructing a Policing System out of the Ashes: Rwanda’s Solution.†Policing & Society 17, no. 4 (2007): 344–366.
Bayley, David H, and Robert M Perito. The Police in War: Fighting Insurgency, Terrorism, and Violent Crime. Colorado: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 2010.
Bester, Deretha, and Bojan Dobovšek. “State Capture: Case of South Africa.†NBP-Journal of Criminalistics and Law 26, no. 1 (2021): 73–87.
Clark, Phil. “Hybridity, Holism, and Traditional Justice: The Case of the Gacaca Courts in Post-Genocide Rwanda.†Geo. Wash. Int’l L. Rev. 39 (2007): 765.
Dano, Givheart. “Are Filipinos Really Hate Duterte’s Leadership?†Indonesian Journal of Education and Social Sciences 3, no. 1 (2024): 53–63.
Feldman, Yuval, and Orly Lobel. “The Incentives Matrix: The Comparative Effectiveness of Rewards, Liabilities, Duties, and Protections for Reporting Illegality.†Tex. L. Rev. 88 (2009): 1151.
Ferdik, Frank V, Jeff Rojek, and Geoffrey P Alpert. “Citizen Oversight in the United States and Canada: An Overview.†Police Practice and Research 14, no. 2 (2013): 104–116.
Frühling, Hugo, and Tom R Tyler. “Police Legitimacy in Chile.†Legitimacy and criminal justice: International perspectives (2007): 115–145.
Garland, David. The Culture of Control: Crime and Social Order in Contemporary Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.
Ghezzi, Elizabeth L, Janie A Funk, and Ramona A Houmanfar. “Restructuring Law Enforcement Agencies to Support Prosocial Values: A Behavior-Scientific Model for Addressing Police Brutality.†Behavior Analysis in Practice 15, no. 4 (2022): 1184–1192.
Goldsmith, Andrew. “Policing Weak States: Citizen Safety and State Responsibility.†Policing & Society 13, no. 1 (2002): 3–21.
Green, Bruce A, and Rebecca Roiphe. “When Prosecutors Politick: Progressive Law Enforcers Then and Now.†J. Crim. L. & Criminology 110 (2020): 719.
Huq, Aziz Z, Tom R Tyler, and Stephen J Schulhofer. “Why Does the Public Cooperate with Law Enforcement? The Influence of the Purposes and Targets of Policing.†Psychology, Public Policy, and Law 17, no. 3 (2011): 419.
Idy, Muhammad Yunus. “Law Enforcement Against Members of The Indonesian National Police Commit Crimes.†Substantive Justice International Journal of Law 5, no. 2 (2022): 143–157.
Ilchi, Omeed S, James Frank, and Shamma J Hickling. “Policing the Police: Predicting Citizen Support for Police Accountability.†Police Practice and Research 23, no. 6 (2022): 722–738.
Jackson, Jonathan, and Jason Sunshine. “Public Confidence in Policing: A Neo-Durkheimian Perspective.†British Journal of Criminology 47, no. 2 (2007): 214–233.
Johnson, David T. “Policing in Japan.†The Sage Handbook of Modern Japanese Studies (2015): 222–243.
Kwon, Jihyun, and Scot Wortley. “Policing the Police: Public Perceptions of Civilian Oversight in Canada.†Race and Justice 12, no. 4 (2022): 644–668.
Lawson, Spencer G, Scott E Wolfe, Jeff Rojek, and Geoffrey P Alpert. “Occupational Stress and Attitudes toward Misconduct in Law Enforcement: The Moderating Role of Organizational Justice.†Police Practice and research 23, no. 1 (2022): 95–110.
Lewis, Paul G, Doris Marie Provine, Monica W Varsanyi, and Scott H Decker. “Why Do (Some) City Police Departments Enforce Federal Immigration Law? Political, Demographic, and Organizational Influences on Local Choices.†Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 23, no. 1 (2013): 1–25.
Longstaff, Abie, James Willer, John Chapman, Sarah Czarnomski, and John Graham. “Neighbourhood Policing: Past, Present and Future.†The Police Foundation (2015): 25–31.
Minzner, Carl F. “China’s Turn against Law.†The American Journal of Comparative Law 59, no. 4 (2011): 935–984.
Moran, Ramon. “Workplace Spirituality in Law Enforcement: A Content Analysis of the Literature.†Journal of Management, Spirituality & Religion 14, no. 4 (2017): 343–364.
Punch, Maurice. “Police Corruption and Its Prevention.†European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research 8, no. 3 (2000): 301–324.
Rose-Ackerman, Susan. “The Law and Economics of Bribery and Extortion.†Annual Review of Law and Social Science 6, no. 1 (2010): 217–238.
Shavell, Steven. “The Optimal Structure of Law Enforcement.†The Journal of Law and Economics 36, no. 1, Part 2 (1993): 255–287.
Simmons, Kami Chavis. “The Politics of Policing: Ensuring Stakeholder Collaboration in the Federal Reform of Local Law Enforcement Agencies.†J. Crim. L. & Criminology 98 (2007): 489.
Sklansky, David Alan. Democracy and the Police. Redwood City: Stanford University Press, 2007.
Smith, J Scott. “‘ Convenience,’" Short-Circuited," and an October Surprise: An Analysis of Hillary Clinton’s Progressive Apologia during the Email Server Scandal.†Kentucky Journal of Communication 36, no. 1 (2017).
Southall, Roger. “Polarization in South Africa: Toward Democratic Deepening or Democratic Decay?†The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 681, no. 1 (2019): 194–208.
ST Quah, Jon. “Curbing Police Corruption in Singapore: Lessons for Other Asian Countries.†Asian Education and Development Studies 3, no. 3 (2014): 186–222.
Tapani, Annukka, and Arto O Salonen. “Identifying Teachers’ Competencies in Finnish Vocational Education.†International Journal for Research in Vocational Education and Training 6, no. 3 (2019): 243–260.
Taylor, Brian D. “Law Enforcement and Civil Society in Russia.†Europe-Asia Studies 58, no. 2 (2006): 193–213.
Tyler, Tom R, and Jonathan Jackson. “Popular Legitimacy and the Exercise of Legal Authority: Motivating Compliance, Cooperation, and Engagement.†Psychology, Public Policy, and Law 20, no. 1 (2014): 78.
Wahl, Rachel. “Policing, Values, and Violence: Human Rights Education with Law Enforcers in India.†Journal of Human Rights Practice 5, no. 2 (2013): 220–242.
Zhao, Jihong Solomon, Chi-Fang Tsai, Ling Ren, and Yung-Lien Lai. “Public Satisfaction with Police Control of Disorder Crime: Does the Public Hold Police Accountable?†Justice Quarterly 31, no. 2 (2014): 394–420.
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors confirm the transfer of all copyrights of the manuscripts to the Board Editors of Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan upon its acceptance for publication and that the Board Editors of Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan have the right to publish, republish, transmit, and distribute them in the JHP journal or other media.
- Manuscripts published by Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution -NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International, which allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Every submitted manuscript should be accompanied by a "Copyright Notice" and "Ethical Statement".
