PENTINGNYA MEMAHAMI PERBUATAN HUKUM TELEKOMUNIKASI DALAM KERJASAMA ANTARA PT. IM2 DENGAN PT. INDOSAT
Downloads
There is a difference between regulatory opinion of the Telecommunications Regulator/Ministry of Communications with the Corruption Court Judge on act did by PT. IM2 in collaboration with PT. Indosat. Title of cooperation between this service providers and network operators are "Internet access via cellular networks Indosat". In view of the regulator, this cooperation is in conformity with the regulations, even obligatory upon network operators to cooperate with the service provider. However, in view of the prosecutor and the judge, this cooperation violates the regulations. A difference of views between regulatory enforcement versus law enforcement is certainly very noteworthy because it will has very big impact to telecommunication development as the backbone of the national economy and the development of national legal systems and culture.
Keywords: Networks, Network Usage, Frequency, Frequency Usage, Frequency Allocation, Frequency Allocation Usage
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors confirm the transfer of all copyrights of the manuscripts to the Board Editors of Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan upon its acceptance for publication and that the Board Editors of Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan have the right to publish, republish, transmit, and distribute them in the JHP journal or other media.
- Manuscripts published by Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution -NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International, which allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Every submitted manuscript should be accompanied by a "Copyright Notice" and "Ethical Statement".
